We pick back up with a look at the people who made the journey possible.

Though our interviewees came from all different parts of the program—from flight operations to engineering to planning to management to actually flying missions—they all had a similar view of Apollo: it was a singular, supernal experience that affected them profoundly. Although many suffered through personal hardships and sacrifices—even the most stable of marriages were tested by seemingly unending years of overtime and weekend work—no one we spoke to regretted their time on Apollo or saw it as anything other than a profoundly worthwhile effort. In many ways, working on the program was a dream job—the ultimate engineering challenge, with an almost laughably audacious goal, balanced by effectively unlimited funding. It’s like that old adage when you have “good,” “fast,” and “cheap,” and you can pick two—for Apollo, “good” and “fast” were the priorities, and “cheap” wasn’t even in the picture.

The result, of course, was that humans walked on the Moon. How could any engineer turn that down?

“The Greatest Leap” returns with part four next Tuesday, January 30. Parts five and six will run on subsequent Tuesdays—February 6 and February 13.

In honor of the 50th anniversary of the beginning of the Apollo Program, Ars Technica brings you an in depth look at the Apollo missions through the eyes of the participants.

Post Author: admin

You may also like

Science after hours: Barney’s aquatic traits and how pregnant women stay upright

At this annual science conference, even humor has thorough research

Eating fish as a child seems to protect you from hay fever

Infants who eat fish are less likely to develop hay

Air strikes in Syria after ceasefire deal

Government forces bomb a rebel-held enclave near Damascus, hours after

Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On Youtube

OUR RECOMMENDATIONS